DJA said:
> I am about to upgrade the hard drives on one of my desktop systems. I
> need more room.
>
> The system now has FC1 and will be upgraded to FC3. I tend to install
> everything because I like to tinker, and well, it's just less tedious.
> The box now has two SCSI drives: 18 GB and 36 GB. I have a new 73 GB
> drive and am inclined to replace both existing drives with it (less
> noise and power).
>
> I am looking for recommendations on partitions. That is, for a home
> desktop system what partition schemes (i.e. /, /boot, /home, etc.) are
> recommended and why? I am not too concerned with sizes as my current
> usage is a pretty good guide here.
>
> Here is my current configuration:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dallen]$ df
> Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda5              7882560   6316848   1165296  85% /
> /dev/sda1               132207     13115    112266  11% /boot
> /dev/sdb1             17726076  12358548   4467088  74% /home
> /dev/sda8              5668740    228192   5152588   5% /opt
> none                    775132         0    775132   0% /dev/shm
> /dev/sda7               988212     17368    920644   2% /tmp
> /dev/sdb2             17551988  14972008   1688376  90% /usr/local
> /dev/sda6              1976492    289784   1586304  16% /var
> seven:/home          230757428  59619540 159416064  28%
> /var/nfsmounts/sevenhome
>
> Swap is ~1.0 GB and on sda. I will consider giving all of sdb to
> /home.
>
> Obviously, /opt, /tmp, and /var are underutilized. /opt will be
> eliminated and the size of both /tmp and /var can probably be cut in
> half. Swap could also shrink as it's rarely used (1.5 GB RAM).
>
> Is there any good reason to give /usr its own partition? I hear talk
> about making it RO but I don't know how practical that is on a Redhat
> GUI system.
>
> What is the benefit vs. penalty of using LVM on a home system,
> especially for the case where the system has only one drive? If so,
> what
> partitions should the LVM FS include or exclude and why?

I would definitely go with LVM. I have switched from Red Hat to SuSE
for reasons of hardware. SuSE had LVM installs long before Red Hat and
I think it's the best way to go. My workstation is set up with / on a
partition and everything else is on LVM called /dev/system. The
advantage to LVM is that if /home is getting to full, and /usr/local
is too big, you can lvreduce /usr/local and lvextend /home to adjust.
With standard partitioning this requires a lot of swapping of data,
until you get it right, and you usually need an extra partition to
swap data to, or you reinstall again. You can also, with LVM add
another drive, and then vgextend and lvextd to add that drive to your
logical volume.

It's really cool, you should give it a try!

-- 
Neil Schneider                              pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
                                           http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B  8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who
are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it - Mark Twain



-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to