On 6/6/05, Stewart Stremler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > begin quoting Todd Walton as of Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:02:16PM -0700: > > Yeah but... Wouldn't sub-standard food mean a loss of revenue, in the > > long run? > > So what?
So overlooking violations of the standard would not mean more money, when it is claimed that the overlooking is for the purpose of gaining more money. > > And if not, then what's the point of the standard in the > > first place? > > To maintain a minimum level of sanitation. Sick or dying citizens are > a drain on the economy, after all. Plus they tend to be cranky voters. So, you're agreeing with me, but in a disagreeing tone of typing. -todd -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
