DJA and Lan, before i wrote this, i called redhat support just to make sure ive done all i can in terms of utilizing my 'entitlements'.
so the answer that ive got from redhat is as follows: we'll give it to another engineer. while i am sure they will solve it some day, i can tell you right now - its not fast enough. because a supported product should not have such fundamental issues. gg --- DJA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lan Barnes wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 07:46:10AM -0700, Gregory Golin wrote: > > > >>Deke, > >> > >>you know what, thats a good idea. im not used to having support. i > will > >>call them, the bastards, even though its too late. the second nic? > yah > >>that crossed my mind. the new intels sometimes require that. didnt > do > >>it because i wanted a uniform and not a time consuming way of > deploying > >>the os. > >> > >>thanks, > >>gg > >> > > > > > > If you've already made up your mind that the support isn't worth > it, > > maybe you should just figure it out yourself. > > I've been wondering the same thing. > > "[I]m not a fan of [R]edhat or [IBM]. [T]he support isn't worth it_. > but > my new boss *bought* like 10 of them [IBM]s." (emphasis mine) > > If support has already been paid for, why isn't it being used? Sorry, > > but from what has been said so far, I'm not seeing how it's the > boss's > fault. Or IBM's. Or Redhat's. > > -- > Best Regards, > ~DJA. > > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list > ____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
