Stewart Stremler wrote:
begin quoting DJA as of Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:57:01PM -0700:
[snip]
Here's a better perspective explaining why the mark needs to be protected.
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20050816092029989
I don't really see that there's a _need_. So what if M$ produces a
M$ Windows Linux? It's that once you decide that M$ shouldn't have a
Linux distro, and you trademark "Linux", you're not in a world of
hurt in that you *have* to enforce the trademark on all, large or
small.
So we really should be a Linuxr user group! And paying $200/year, too.
Looks like we finally have something to spend our raffle money on.
-Stewart "Ready to use GNU/Linux(R)?" Stremler
No, because as far as I can tell, KPLUG's use of the word Linux falls
under fair use which requires no license.
--
Best Regards,
~DJA.
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
