Quoting boblq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

400 cpus or even 10 times that seems like a drop in the bucket
when compared with consumer markets for millions of units. Does
EDA really matter to Intel? Why?

It does.. at least in that we're still actually pretty small compute size wise
and will only keep growing.  Other companies that have similar mass compute
farms that already dwarf ours are places like ATI, Nvidia, Lucas arts,
Dreamworks, etc..

It turns out that EDA and computer animation are _very_ similar in compute
needs (lots of jobs that aren't parallelizable, using a grid-like system to
dispatch jobs to systems).  While the end result and tools are very
different, they use computers a lot like we do.  Attended a talk at LW a
couple weeks ago where a guy from Dreamworks talked, and it was like hearing
one of us talk about supporting chip designers.

I don't mean to suggest that we're a _huge_ share of their market, but we are
enough that it should be on their radar.  Not to mention Intel has to do a
lot of EDA work themselves.

For awhile there, Itanium was going to be the future platform for EDA compute
work.. that didn't last for long.  Too expensive and being passed in speed by
the x86_64 line.

Oh, and Intel does see EDA as somewhat of an important market.. you should
hear them pushing their idea of remote computing work in EDA on laptops.
Talk of licensing the products in a way that you can checkout a license, then
disconnect from the net and work remotely, then check it back in later.  Intel
loves it, because the laptops would be upgraded pretty regularly to keep up
with speed I'm sure.  Some of the ISVs love it, because it would guarantee
more licenses to them, since people would have licenses out for long periods
when they're not in use, whereas now they're only checked out as a tool runs.

We don't like the idea ourselves for various reasons.. data sync would be a
huge problem, tools having to be installed on every host vs our usage of AFS,
cost of licenses.. laptops that are stolen with that much more company IP on
it.. or just laptops damaged after the engineer did a ton of work, etc..

--
Mike Marion-Unix SysAdmin/Staff Engineer-http://www.miguelito.org
Marge: "Homer, sitting that close to the TV can't be good for you."
Homer: "Talking while the TV's on can't be good for you!"
==> Simpsons



--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to