Wise insight.
On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 22:50 -0700, Stewart Stremler wrote: > begin quoting m ike as of Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:18:05PM -0700: > > > Otherwise, Shakespeare (and other valuable works) would be owned by the > > > individual (or in todays context, corporations) forever, and noone would > > > be able to use them without paying the copyright owner a fee > > > > Honestly, I do not see what is wrong with that. In these terms, a > > leveled economic playing field would benefit young writers. Sounds > > good to me. > > All great writing "steals" from what came before. > > The public domain is the soil in which creativity grows. Ever-increasing > copyrights make the soil poor. > > -Stewart "Nothing new under the sun" Stremler > > -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
