Well there is a lot to consider here thanks Mike. My impression however is that 
the real gains for blades will come from dual core processor and RISC . If 
anyone has seen any good roi studies and also covers some issues that Mike 
mentioned I would be very interested.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael J McCafferty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Main Discussion List for KPLUG" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: PC blades
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:44:58 -0700

> 
> 
> Well, my problem with the blade systems I have used in the past are 
> as follows:
> 
> 1) Expensive and low power blades. After you figure in the cost of 
> the chassis, they ain't so cheap. If I was desperately low on rack 
> space, or if i was going to use so many of them that my data center 
> wasn't large enough then, the cost might be justified.
> 
> 2) Performance. The blades I used in the past had laptop drives, 
> there's no way I'd make 10 Windows users suffer on a single blade. 
> But, it was amazing to see 16 blades in just 3U of rack space 
> though. Compute clusters, DNS servers, stuff like that... great use 
> for these things.
> 
> 3) Misc. weirdness and proprietary hardware: Strange network switch 
> built in, couldn't run Windows cuz it didn't have a video card on 
> the blades or anyway to share one... and Windows wouldn't install 
> headless. Solaris and Linux worked great though.
> 
> That being said, I am surfing the HP site for blade servers now, 
> and it appears that there has been a quantum leap in blade power, 
> and cost. I still think that the applications are limited. Your 
> question about why not a big SMP machine can be answered in a 
> million different ways, depending on which of the million different 
> uses for a computer you are considering. For instance, if you 
> needed to run a heavily used 10TB+ Data Warehouse, your gonna want 
> that large SMP machine. If you want to run 20 different 
> applications, put `em on 20 blades instead of a bigger single box. 
> I notice that HP has a quad-Xeon blade with room for 12Gb of RAM 
> and 2 SAN cards.... maybe you CAN use a blade for a big DB. Well, I 
> have learned something in this thread.
> 
> 
> 
> At 10:12 AM 10/26/2005, Michael O'Keefe wrote:
> > Randall Shimizu wrote:
> >> I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on PC blades. IBM (HP and
> >> Clearcube make PC blades also )
> >> (http://news.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=/10-5-0&fp=435e179035481b19&ei=HP5eQ6nXL8Oa6wH259HkCA&url=http%3A//www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml%3FarticleID%3D172303304&cid=1101960915
> >> > ) has announced a new solutions offering with their Bladecenter
> >> product. IBM has partnered with VMware to offer a virtualized
> >> desktiop environment. According to IBM they can host from 10-15
> >> clients on each blade. IBM"s solution is a VMware Citrix client for
> >> those in the Windows group. 20 clients is what I heard on linux
> >> terminal services.
> >> So the question then becomes is the blade the right platform ....???
> >> After all 10-20 not all that much. Would not a large SMP machine be
> >> much more suitable.....?? Now of course scalability is entirely
> >> different for Linux and Window, but does raise some interesting roi
> >> questions....
> >
> > I've used both IBM's and HP's blade systems at work.
> > I currently have the IBM's, but I preferred the HP's
> > I run vmWare's ESX product on each blade, and have 7 guest OS's 
> > (all linux) on each, giving me about 80 hosts (IIRC)
> >
> > I don't remember the cost, but I think it was something like $90k ?
> > So if that's correct, it runs about $1k/host
> > But that's more a vmWare ROI than a blade-center ROI answer....
> >
> > --
> > Michael O'Keefe                      |          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Live on and Ride a 03 BMW F650GSDakar|          [EMAIL PROTECTED]      / |
> > I like less more or less less than   |Work:+1 858 845 3514        /  |
> > more. UNIX-live it,love it,fork() it |Fax :+1 858 845 2652       /_p_|
> > My views are MINE ALONE, blah, blah, |Home:+1 760 788 1296       \`O'|
> > blah, yackety yack - don't come back |Fax :+1 858                _/_\|_,
> >
> >
> > --
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
> 
> 
> -- [email protected]
> http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list



Randall Shimizu
Cabrillo Computer Solutions
619-223-6947


-- 
___________________________________________________
Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com/


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to