I would second Ruby on Rails. Andy & I had a conversation before about what best way to do web apps was. Rails might be the way forward. However, having said that,...I would never use Rails because I like Python better and there are Rails like frameworks for Python I'm excited about.....
See Django or Turbogears. Chris On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 13:15 -0800, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > Gus Wirth wrote: > > Java has good Unicode support and has a plethora of ways for using it. You > > can start with just some small CGI style apps until you decide you want > > something like JSP (Java Server Pages) where you can then use the Apache > > Tomcat product. > > > > Stewart Stremler can tell you gory details about doing J2EE. > > There are probably lighter Java frameworks that would fit your needs. > > Something like Tapestry might be easier to deal with in the small rather > than JSP (which can be pretty verbose for simple stuff). > > I am surprised nobody has mention Ruby on Rails. For the simplest > stuff, this is probably the fastest way. However, if you want more than > very basic stuff, you'd have to learn Ruby. > > As for Unicode, the only one which handles Unicode completely is Java. > Period. > > The others handle it, kinda, sorta, but you have to jump through some hoops. > > -a > > -- _______________________________________ Christian Seberino, Ph.D. SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego Code 2872 49258 Mills Street, Room 158 San Diego, CA 92152-5385 U.S.A. Phone: (619) 553-9973 Fax : (619) 553-6521 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
