The other possible factor is that AMD does not yet support hyperthreading. (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13344 )Hyperthreading is designed to treat a single cpu as 2.
--- Gabriel Sechan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >From: Randall Shimizu > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >It's quite probable, because I am don't think if > >Microsoft has fully optimized XP and Win 2003 for > AMD > >dual core as of yet. > > > A dual core and a dual proc system are the same, to > an OS. Of course, XP > could just suck with dual procs as well. > > Gabe > > > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list > -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
