On Tuesday 07 February 2006 07:55 am, Carl Lowenstein wrote:
> > Note the really neat use of the switch statement. If n__ != 1, 2, or 3 it
> > falls through to the goto L999; which is how the flag intg=TRUE_ gets set
> > for the code associated with L_reaval ... I suspect this code resulted
> > from a FORTRAN computed goto.
> >
> > Ah that was "Back in the day ..."
> >
> > The horrible thing is that after you look at this stuff long enough it
> > starts to make a weird sort of sense. That is when  you know that
> > your brain is really being messed up badly by even trying to work
> > with code that looks like this. God only knows what the next code
> > I write for myself with look like.
>
> The weird sort of sense is due to the fact that this code was
> generated by a program that was parsing Fortran and compiling it into
> C.  Perhaps the approach could be to make a decompiler to go back to
> the original source.  Of course the comments in the source have been
> lost long ago.

That is right. I have written compilers myself so I can see 
how you get constructs like that. I cannot claim to be in
love with working with them as my main source. 

> I once spent some time on manual decompilation back to Fortran from
> threaded-code PDP-11 machine instructions.  First, of course, turning
> them into pseudo-assembly language.  By the time I had finished this,
> I had identified a couple of coding errors in the original Fortran, by
> the mental process of "why does the code do this weird thing."  Like
> INCHES is an integer but CENTIMETERS is not.

I could ... no, no. I am not going to write a decompiler 
for this trash. I have handed it back to the original 
author and requested that he make it run. I was supposed
to simply use the inputs to this programs as a target for
my real work, which is to translate some well defined 
XML into a form that can be input into this system. 

BobLQ




>     carl
> --
>     carl lowenstein         marine physical lab     u.c. san diego
>                                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to