Am Mittwoch, 15. März 2006 19:08 schrieb Stewart Stremler:
> begin  quoting Dexter Filmore as of Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 06:46:46PM +0100:
> > Am Samstag, 11. M?rz 2006 00:00 schrieb Tracy R Reed:
>
> [snip]
>
> > > You would only need to put your public key on the remote machine.
> > > Normally you email it to the admin and he installs it for you in lieu
> > > of setting you a password and telling you the password.
> >
> > Even better was if ssh sent the public key to that machine and emailed
> > the admin with a request to allow the key to login.
> > One would have to code that into ssh of course or similar.
>
> Why?

To have an official standard.

> A usb stick is basically just a very long password that you have to keep
> written down somewhere.  Stick your USB stick into an untrusted computer,
> and your key is compromised, just like a fixed password would be.

If all that can be read is my public key?

>
> Go one step further ... use a smart-card; to communicate with the remote
> system, the local system streams data to the smart card, and the smart
> card encrypts/decrypts it.  Include a challenge-response mechanism in
> there as well, and you have something worthwhile.  An untrusted computer
> can't do anything to you after the fact, but only while you're using it.

USB sticks - spread, can attach almost to any half way modern computer.
Smart card reader - about as common as BeOS. 
I agree on your security thoughts, but what good is a key that doesn't fit any 
lock. 

>
> (Best is a laptop -- you keep your keys, input system, and display system
> all under *your* control.  Trusted endpoints, untrusted network.)
>

Laptop on my keyring will have me lose my pants a lot in public. not good. ;)

> > What I would want is a key that not only grants me access to the local
> > machine but to any machine on the network I'm supposed to have access to.
>
> That would be equivalent to having one key to your car, your front door,
> your side door, your safe, your suitcases, etc.

If that key - and the locks! - are sufficiently secure - alright.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C+++(++++) UL+>++++ P+>++ L+++>++++ E-- W++ N o? K-
w--(---) !O M+ V- PS++(+) PE(-) Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(++) tv--(+)@ 
b++(+++) DI+++ D G++ e* h>++ r%>* y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

http://www.stop1984.com
http://www.againsttcpa.com


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to