On Apr 17, 2006, at 9:37 PM, boblq wrote:

Not necessarily. One may blow off ack/nak and go with
forward error correction ... and thus have a whole new
thing with some very different attributes and issues.

I wonder, given "typical" network traffic, if you'd actually use more or less bandwidth on a no-retransmissions, forward error correction packet transmission scheme than with TCP's "ACK every packet or ask for a retransmit" scheme.

FECUND (Forward Error Correction User Network Datagram) Protocol, anyone?

fecund - adjective - producing or capable of producing an abundance of offspring or new growth; fertile: a lush and fecund garden | figurative - her fecund imagination. See note at fertile.

* technical (of a woman or women) capable of becoming pregnant and giving birth.

Almost seems appropriate.

Gregory

--
Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
OpenPGP Key ID: EAF4844B  keyserver: pgpkeys.mit.edu



--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to