On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 12:35:06PM -0700, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> Lan Barnes wrote:
> >I use svn+ssh exclusively and am very happy with it. Of course, I'm
> >personally disinclined to reach for browser interfaces (gotta get over
> >that, I suppose), and less inclined to try to write one. It limits me
> >because that's what the people want these days.
>
> svn with apache isn't really a browser interface. It works just like
> regular svn except you use https:// instead of svn:// or ssh+svn:// but
> you are right in that svn+ssh is probably a better idea. I'll look into
> that.
I don't know if I can get behind "is probably a better idea," but "works
for me" is defensible.
That I didn't know that it wasn't a browser interface is yet another
example of how I push all that port 80 stuff out of my mind. And I'm not
being coy when I say that I've got to get over that.
--
Lan Barnes
Linux Guy, SCM Specialist
Tcl/Tk Enthusiast
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
- Arthur C. Clarke
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
