On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:32:57AM -0800, Rachel Garrett wrote: > The first two of these authors had mechanisms of earning a living from > their work, and if the value they offered could have been easily > duplicated and passed around, it would have significantly damaged > their ability to earn a living as creative people.
My point was that these authors made $$ w/o copyright. Because there was no copyright so their value *could* have been 'easily duplicated and passed around'. People likely *did* copy them yet they still created. cs -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
