John Oliver wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 02:11:30PM -0800, Lan Barnes wrote: >> ... all of it. They want to protect the children. Umm ... and national >> security ... oh, and fight computer crime. Yeah, that's it; that's the >> ticket! >> >> http://www.grandhaventribune.com/paid/317067006680886.bsp >> >> So I'm seeing a transfer server in Tijuana that dumps records right after >> a session. Maybe with ssh tunneling. Is that a good project? > > What kind of resources does a machine need to sit there and be an X > client? I've thought of setting something up for when I'm behind a > firewall or proxy that keeps me out of sites I have a God-given right to > peruse :-D Something that works only over SSH and dumps all logs to > /dev/null and is in another country could be quite worthwhile. > > But would Tijuana really be the best place? How about some place like > Sweden, which has really strong privacy laws and isn't likely to play > stooge to the US government? > > Heck, we have two data centers in France... maybe I could sneak > something in there. I'm told we get 50 Mb/s out of one :-D >
Tunnel ssh to the remote server and run a squid proxy there. -- Mark Wolfe Lakeside, Ca. http://www.wolfenet.org gpg fingerprint = 42B6 EFEB 5414 AA18 01B7 64AC EF46 F7E6 82F6 8C71 Microsoft - We put the "backwards" into backwards compatibility. -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
