Lan Barnes wrote:

As an SCM guy I will say that you can s/git/<anything>/ and
s/mercurial/<anything>/ and s/python/<anything>/ and I've seen it all
before because (wait for it) ...

... something about being a SW developer turns otherwise normal people
into egomaniacal cry babies with delusions of grandeur. The guys mostly.
The chicks are usually quite sane.

I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you were talking about the people bringing uninformed pressure to bear, either direction. However:

1) I'm sure that the "chicks" in programming would be *SO* pleased with your completely unsubstantiated, sexist assessment. I think I will fail to pass it on further, thank you very much.

2) While the original poster did make subjective comments about "ease of use," he also made two very factual comments. The first was about RedHat / Fedora being a big user of the implementation language. The second was about being more able to contribute upstream changes. Given Linus has already demonstrated complete intransigence even when wrong, this is a not insubstantial issue.

Finally, you will note that my first line points out that they wanted a "distributed" source control system. SVN was not mentioned or considered by them because it does not play in that particular space.

-a


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to