On Sun, January 14, 2007 10:54 am, Todd Walton wrote: > On 1/13/07, Lan Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, January 13, 2007 7:55 pm, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >> > 1) I'm sure that the "chicks" in programming would be *SO* pleased >> with >> > your completely unsubstantiated, sexist assessment. I think I will >> fail >> > to pass it on further, thank you very much. >> >> What are you getting upset about? You're not a chick, you're a >> developer. > > That's even worse than your original comment. So bad that I have to > wonder if you're kidding, which wouldn't make it any better. >
Of course I'm kidding. And dissipating karma I can afford. ;-) ;-) ;) Better late than never. >> And what does Linus have to do with Red Hat's assigned tool set? > > Linus is a principal developer of git. > Oh. Maybe I ought to look at it. And that would expain the arrogant support. Linus isn't known for patience in those areas. FWIW, I consider that attitude by a developer or trainer as unconscionable, whatever the merits of the SW. -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
