From the Cringley article:

<quote.
Looking at this problem from another angle, right now somewhat more
than half of all Internet bandwidth is being used for BitTorrent
traffic, which is mainly video. Yet if you surveyed your neighbors
you'd find that few of them are BitTorrent users. Less than 5 percent
of all Internet users are presently consuming more than 50 percent of
all bandwidth. Broadband ISPs hate these super users and would like to
find ways to isolate or otherwise reject them. It's BitTorrent -- not
Yahoo or Google -- that has been the target of the anti-net neutrality
trash talk from telcos and cable companies. But the fact is that
rather than being an anomaly, these are simply early adopters and
we'll all soon follow in their footsteps. And when that happens, there
won't be enough bandwidth to support what we want to do from any
centralized perspective. A single data center, no matter how large,
won't be enough. Google is just the first large player to recognize
this fact as their building program proves.
</quote>

But yet another alternative would be a true P2P network based on WiFi (or?)
and very cheap FREEVO type devices.

Meanwhile M$ is stuch in DRW lala land.

Bittorent + RSS = FREEVO

Torrentocracy is a MythTV "plugin" that uses bittorrent aggregation
sites RSS feeds. This new MythTV plugin torrentocracy allows you to
surf for the latest filez/torrents out there and initiate a download
with a flick of your remote. How cool is that? Not that I advocate
distribution of copyrighted material, but one can see how having bit
torrent potential so close to your collection of PVR'd programming
could lead to a "mesh" network of programming between peoples MythTV
boxen... That'd be mighty cool homebrew on demand TV =)

http://www.byopvr.com/displayarticle85.html

Has anyone explored this? Looks like a chance for Lan
to go yet another mile (the last mile? :)

BobLQ


BobLQ


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to