On Mon, March 26, 2007 11:55 pm, Karl Cunningham wrote: > For most of us, our > first significant relationship is not with the person we end up with > late in life. Those earlier relationships can, IMO, successfully be > sexual as well as emotional. And they may be entered into with long-time > goals in mind, or not.
If very young people are not ready to get married for the reasons you said then isn't that a good argument that it might be better for them to delay sex until they *are* ready to get married and avoid lots of problems? This isn't a religious question just a practical question. Let me put it another way, if you weren't an expert in the stock market would it make sense for you to invest all your life savings in your stock picks before you learned a few things first? Does that really sound that crazy and old fashioned? > For many people, myself included, spending one's entire life with one > partner is not a very probable outcome. Shit happens, as they say. What do you mean? Please elaborate. What could happen that a marriage couldn't work through? Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
