-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: EFFector list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: EFFector list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EFFector 20.25: Ten Years After ACLU v. Reno: Free Speech
> Still Needs Defending
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 22:47:18 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> EFFector Vol. 20, No. 25  June 25, 2007  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> A Publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation
> ISSN 1062-9424
> 
> In the 429th Issue of EFFector:
> 
>  * Ten Years After ACLU v. Reno: Free Speech Still Needs 
> Defending
>  * Action Alert - Stop the National ID Expansion!
>  * Dangerous Ruling Forces Search Engine to Log Users
>  * Congress Set to Uncover Truth About NSA Spying Program
>  * Travelers Deserve Protection from Baseless Laptop 
> Searches
>  * Blogging WIPO: Broadcasting Treaty Deferred Indefinitely
>  * DVD Home Media Server, We Hardly Knew You
>  * Viacom Nets, Releases Another Fair Use Dolphin
>  * miniLinks (14): Former FISA Judge Criticizes Wiretap 
> Program 
>  * Administrivia
> 
> For more information on EFF activities & alerts:
>  http://www.eff.org/
> 
> Make a donation and become an EFF member today!
>  http://eff.org/support/
> 
> Tell a friend about EFF:
>  http://action.eff.org/site/Ecard?ecard_id=1061
> 
> effector: n, Computer Sci. A device for producing a desired 
> change.
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Ten Years After ACLU v. Reno: Free Speech Still Needs 
> Defending
> 
> Online free speech faces many threats today, but the 
> Internet's incredible abundance and variety of expression 
> might never have blossomed to begin with if the first major 
> court battle had gone the wrong way.
> 
> Tuesday marks the ten-year anniversary of the U.S. Supreme 
> Court's landmark decision in Reno v. ACLU, which recognized 
> that free speech on the Internet merits the highest 
> standards of Constitutional protection. EFF participated as 
> both plaintiff and co-counsel in the case, which 
> successfully challenged the online censorship provisions of 
> the Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996. The Court's 
> decision -- its first involving the Internet -- was issued 
> on June 26, 1997.
> 
> The CDA fight was one of the first big rallying points for 
> online freedom. When the law passed, thousands of websites 
> turned their backgrounds black in protest. EFF launched its 
> "blue ribbon" campaign and millions of websites around the 
> world joined in support of free speech online. Even today, 
> you can find the blue ribbon throughout the Web.
> 
> EFF Senior Counsel David Sobel, who served as co-counsel in 
> the case, notes: "The Reno decision defined the First 
> Amendment for the 21st century. The Court wrote on a clean 
> slate and established the fundamental principles that 
> govern free speech issues in the electronic age."
> 
> EFF's work over the past ten years demonstrates that while 
> the technology might evolve, threats to online expression 
> persist and core First Amendment principles must be 
> vigilantly defended. The CDA was a crystal clear case of 
> unconstitutional government censorship, and the challenges 
> today are sometimes more complex. EFF's efforts today 
> include:
> 
>     * Intermediaries: EFF fights to protect Internet 
> middlemen -- like hosting services, search engines, and 
> ISPs -- from overreaching liability, so that creators of 
> amazing free speech tools don't have to worry about being 
> held responsible for everything that Internet users say.
>     * "Fair Use": EFF defends "fair use" of copyrighted 
> material, including its ongoing campaign to counter bogus 
> copyright takedowns on YouTube and elsewhere.
>     * Bloggers' Rights: EFF promotes bloggers' rights 
> through litigation and distribution of a comprehensive 
> legal guide.
>     * Anonymous speech: EFF supports online anonymity, 
> primarily through representation of defendants in "John 
> Doe" lawsuits filed by large corporations and thin-skinned 
> public officials who want to intimidate their anonymous 
> critics.
>     * "Right to Know": EFF uses the Freedom of Information 
> Act to promote the public's "right to know" and facilitate 
> informed and open debate on technology and civil liberties 
> issues.
> 
> The fight against direct government censorship of online 
> speech continues, too. EFF continues to participate in the 
> pending litigation against the Children's Online Protection 
> Act (COPA), a slightly narrower but still gravely dangerous 
> version of the CDA that the Supreme Court has twice 
> enjoined.
> 
> While it can sometimes seem that there are more fronts than 
> ever in the fight for free speech online, the battles we 
> face today would be much, much harder without that first 
> victory in ACLU v. Reno. With your help, we'll fight to 
> make sure that ten years from now, we can look back and see 
> how today's battles helped pave the way for an even better 
> future online.
> 
> For the Reno v. ACLU decision:
> http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/EFF_ACLU_v_DoJ/19970626_cda.decision
> 
> For a news article on the "Turn the Web" black protest:
> http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/4.05/scans.html
> 
> For the Blue Ribbon campaign:
> http://www.eff.org/br/
> 
> For this post and more related links:
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005335.php
> 
> Support EFF and become a member today!
> http://www.eff.org/support/
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Action Alert: Stop the National ID Expansion!
> 
> Thousands of individuals and sixteen states have already 
> told the federal government to dump the privacy-invasive 
> REAL ID Act, which would standardize drivers' licenses into 
> a national ID and create databases linking the records 
> together. But instead of listening to the public, members 
> of Congress are renewing their efforts to ram the unfunded 
> mandate down everyone's throats. A provision smuggled into 
> the major immigration reform bill would effectively force 
> every American to present a standardized national ID in 
> order to get a job and establish a huge "employment 
> verification" system filled with personal information.  
> 
> The proposal is set for a floor vote next week -- call your 
> Senator now to stop the national ID expansion:
> http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=303
> 
> This bill realizes one of our main fears about REAL ID -- 
> once in place, uses of the IDs and database will inevitably 
> expand to facilitate a wide range of tracking and 
> surveillance activities. Remember, the Social Security 
> number started innocuously enough, but it has become a 
> prerequisite for a host of government services and been co-
> opted by private companies to create massive databases of 
> personal information.
> 
> The proposed employment verification system is bound to 
> contain errors impacting millions of Americans, and, along 
> with inevitable delays implementing REAL ID, that could 
> present unnecessary hurdles when you apply for a job. The 
> verification system would also make your private 
> information more vulnerable to government misuse, security 
> breaches, and identity theft.
> 
> The more uses created for REAL ID, the harder it becomes to 
> get the Act off the books entirely. Tell your Senators to 
> fix this part of the immigration bill by supporting Senate 
> Amendments 1236 and 1441:
> http://action.eff.org/site/Advocacy?id=303
> 
> To learn more about what's wrong with REAL ID, see EFF's 
> issue page:
> http://www.eff.org/Privacy/ID/RealID/
> 
> For the ACLU's REAL ID webpage:
> http://www.realnightmare.org/
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Dangerous Ruling Forces Search Engine to Log Users
> 
> Public Interest Groups Urge Court to Block Radical 
> Expansion of Discovery Rules
> 
> San Francisco - The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) 
> and Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) urged a 
> California court Friday to overturn a dangerous ruling that 
> would require an Internet search engine to create and store 
> logs of its users' activities as part of electronic 
> discovery obligations in a civil lawsuit.
> 
> The ruling came in a copyright infringement lawsuit filed 
> by motion picture studios against TorrentSpy, a popular 
> search engine that indexes materials made publicly 
> available via the Bit Torrent file sharing protocol. 
> TorrentSpy has never logged its visitors' Internet Protocol 
> (IP) addresses. Notwithstanding this explicit privacy 
> policy, a federal magistrate judge has now ordered 
> TorrentSpy to activate logging and turn the logged data 
> over to the studios.
> 
> "This unprecedented ruling has implications well beyond the 
> file sharing context," said EFF Staff Attorney Corynne 
> McSherry. "Giving litigants the power to rewrite their 
> opponent's privacy policies poses a risk to all Internet 
> users."
> 
> The magistrate judge incorrectly reasoned that, because the 
> IP addresses exist in the Random Access Memory (RAM) of 
> TorrentSpy's webservers, they are "electronically stored 
> information" that must be collected and turned over to the 
> studios under the rules of federal discovery.
> 
> This decision could reach every function carried out by a 
> digital device. Every keystroke at a computer keyboard, for 
> example, is temporarily held in RAM, even if it is 
> immediately deleted and never saved. Similarly, digital 
> telephone systems make recordings of every conversation, 
> moment by moment, in RAM.
> 
> "In the analog world, a court would never think to force a 
> company to record telephone calls, transcribe employee 
> conversations, or log other ephemeral information," said 
> EFF Senior Staff Attorney Fred von Lohmann. "There is no 
> reason why the rules should be different simply because a 
> company uses digital technologies."
> 
> The decision also threatens to radically increase the 
> burdens that companies face in federal lawsuits, 
> potentially forcing them to create and store an avalanche 
> of data, including computer server logs, digital telephone 
> conversations, and drafts of documents never saved or sent.
> 
> The magistrate judge in the case has stayed her order while 
> TorrentSpy appeals the ruling. The case is Columbia 
> Pictures Industries v. Bunnell, No. 06-01093 FMC, pending 
> in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of 
> California before Judge Florence-Marie Cooper.
> 
> Read the full amicus brief:
> http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/torrentspy/EFF_CDT_amicus.pdf
> 
> For this post:
> http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2007_06.php#005334
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Congress Set to Uncover Truth About NSA Spying Program
> 
> Vote to Authorize Subpoenas Sets Stage for Showdown Over 
> Illegal Surveillance
> 
> San Francisco - The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 
> Thursday to authorize subpoenas related to the National 
> Security Agency (NSA)'s domestic spying program, setting 
> the stage for a Congressional showdown over the 
> surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans. The 
> subpoenas demand certain legal documents that the 
> Administration has withheld despite repeated requests from 
> Congress.
> 
> "This subpoena authorization is a critical first step 
> toward uncovering the full extent of the NSA's illegal 
> spying and the role that telecommunications companies like 
> AT&T played in it," said EFF Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. 
> "Considering that it's been almost six years since the NSA 
> started spying on Americans without warrants and over a 
> year since that spying was revealed publicly, these 
> subpoenas are long overdue. It's high time for Congress to 
> get to the bottom of this mess."
> 
> The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is suing AT&T for 
> illegally assisting in the NSA spying. The government has 
> asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss 
> EFF's case, claiming that the lawsuit could expose state 
> secrets.
> 
> "Our case against AT&T includes evidence from a former 
> employee that points to a massive spying program impacting 
> millions of people -- a program far broader than the 
> government has admitted to," said Bankston. "Americans 
> deserve to know the truth about the NSA program."
> 
> For more on EFF's class-action lawsuit against AT&T:
> http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/
> 
> For this post:
> http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2007_06.php#005329
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Travelers Deserve Protection from Baseless Laptop 
> Searches
> 
> EFF Urges Court to Protect Privacy at Border Crossings
> 
> San Francisco - The government should not search travelers' 
> computers at border crossings without suspicion, said the 
> Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the Association of 
> Corporate Travel Executives (ACTE) in an amicus brief filed 
> today in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
> 
> Over the past several years, U.S. Customs Agents have been 
> searching and even seizing travelers' laptops when they are 
> entering or leaving the country if the traveler fits a 
> profile, appears to be on a government watch list, or is 
> chosen for a random inspection. The Supreme Court has ruled 
> that customs and border agents may perform "routine" 
> searches at the border without a warrant or even reasonable 
> suspicion, but EFF and ACTE argue that inspections of 
> computers are far more invasive than flipping through a 
> briefcase.
> 
> "Our laptop computers contain vast amounts of personal 
> information about our lives. You may do your banking on 
> your computer, for example, or send email to your doctor 
> about health concerns," said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Lee 
> Tien. "Travelers should not be subjected to 
> unconstitutionally invasive searches of their laptops and 
> other electronic devices just because they are crossing the 
> border."
> 
> The case in front of the 9th Circuit, United States v. 
> Arnold, arose out of a suspicionless "profile" search of 
> Michael Timothy Arnold's computer at Los Angeles 
> International Airport. The search uncovered evidence of 
> alleged child pornography, and Mr. Arnold moved to suppress 
> the evidence as the product of an unconstitutional search. 
> The district court ruled that the agents lacked a 
> reasonable basis to suspect Mr. Arnold of having committed 
> a crime, and the government appealed the ruling. Mr. Arnold 
> is represented by the Pasadena law firm of Kaye, McLane & 
> Bednarski, LLP. The EFF-ACTE amicus brief was prepared by 
> Arent Fox LLP.
> 
> For the full amicus brief:
> http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/US_v_arnold/arnold_amicus.pdf
> 
> For this post:
> http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2007_06.php#005324
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Blogging WIPO: Broadcasting Treaty Deferred Indefinitely
> 
> Negotiations on the proposed WIPO Broadcasting Treaty ended 
> in Geneva on Friday with some welcome news. WIPO Member 
> States agreed to recommend that the WIPO General Assembly 
> postpone the high-level intergovernmental Diplomatic 
> Conference at which the draft treaty could have been 
> adopted, and move discussions back to regular committee 
> meetings, down a significant notch from the last two 
> "Special Session" meetings.
> 
> Apart from pulling the plug on a diplomatic conference that 
> seemed doomed for failure, Friday's decision also provides a 
> much-needed opportunity for WIPO to start focusing on other 
> initiatives, such as facilitating access to knowledge, 
> evaluating the impact of legally-enforced technological 
> protection measures on exceptions and limitations, and 
> Chile's 2004 proposal for mandatory exceptions and 
> limitations to copyright law for education, the disabled 
> and libraries and archives.
> 
> Read EFF's briefing paper on the latest treaty draft:
> http://www.eff.org/IP/WIPO/broadcasting_treaty/EFF_wipo_briefing_paper_062007.pdf
> 
> Read the Open Letter to WIPO:
> http://dearwipo.com/
> 
> For EFF's WIPO Broadcasting Treaty page:
> http://www.eff.org/IP/WIPO/broadcasting_treaty/
> 
> For the entire update and related links:
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005333.php
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * DVD Home Media Server, We Hardly Knew You
> 
> In April, a California court ruled that Kaleidescape did 
> not violate its contract with the DVD Copy Control 
> Association (DVD CCA) by distributing a device that rips 
> and plays DVDs. But now the DRM licensing authority, which 
> is mostly controlled by movie studios, is planning to 
> change the contract and more clearly forbid DVD ripping.
> 
> Make no mistake: the VCR, TiVo, iPod, and myriad other 
> technologies could have faced Kaleidescape's fate if the 
> entertainment industry had been able to infect TV and music 
> with DRM sooner. This is also the fate that awaits all 
> future television technologies if DRM is baked in thanks to 
> the broadcast flag and CableCARD.
> 
> For EFF's Broadcast Flag page:
> http://www.eff.org/IP/broadcastflag/
> 
> For EFF's page on DRM for Digital Cable and Satellite
> http://www.eff.org/IP/pnp/
> 
> Read the complete post:
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005330.php
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Sony Disconnects
> 
> In May 2004, Sony opened up its own store for selling 
> digital music: Sony Connect. From the start, the service 
> was plagued with self-inflicted woes. Thanks to Sony's use 
> of DRM and a proprietary music format (ATRAC), music bought 
> through Sony Connect could only be played on Sony's 
> expensive digital music players. And those devices came 
> loaded with software that was awkward and hard to use.
> 
> Not surprisingly, Sony is rumored to be pulling the plug on 
> Sony Disconnect, or at least downsizing it. In any case, 
> the problems of Sony's premiere music service make a point 
> that deserves emphasis: customers don't like having their 
> options limited and being herded into using poorly designed 
> technology.
> 
> Of course, these dangers exist whenever you buy DRMed music 
> from any vendor. You're locked into the limited array of 
> players that the DRM is compatible with, and, if that DRM 
> some day is entirely unsupported, you're out of luck.
> 
> Read EFF Activist Hugh D'Andrade's complete analysis and 
> related links:
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005328.php
> 
> For EFF's "The Customer Is Always Wrong: A User's Guide to 
> DRM in Online Music":
> http://www.eff.org/IP/DRM/guide/
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Viacom Nets, Releases Another Fair Use Dolphin
> 
> When a company like Viacom sends more than 160,000 DMCA 
> takedown notices to YouTube, there is a risk that some fair 
> use "dolphins" will get caught along with the infringing 
> "tuna." Well, another "dolphin" got caught up in the DMCA 
> takedown driftnet. 
> 
> Last week, Paramount Pictures (a unit of Viacom) apparently 
> sent a DMCA takedown notice to YouTube, resulting in the 
> removal of the hugely popular video "10 Things I Hate About 
> Commandments," an example of the new genre of movie trailer 
> mashups that has blossomed on YouTube.
> 
> So after the creators contacted EFF, we urged them to test 
> out the "dolphin hotline," which Viacom created after 
> getting into hot water for mistakenly taking down 
> MoveOn.org's "Stop the Falsiness" video. 
> 
> Find out what happened in EFF Staff Attorney Fred von 
> Lohmann's complete post:
> http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/005327.php
> 
> Watch the video "10 Things I Hate About Commandments" on 
> YouTube:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1kqqMXWEFs
> 
> Read more about EFF's lawsuit against Viacom:
> http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/moveon_v_viacom/
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * miniLinks
> The week's noteworthy news, compressed.
> 
> ~ Former FISA Judge Criticizes Wiretap Program
> Judge Lamberth says "you can't trust the executive."
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/24/washington/24judge.html?ex=1340337600&en=17176b6b4f93cc82&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
> 
> ~ Video of Judge Lamberth's speech:
> http://www.ala.org/ala/washoff/washevents/woannual/annualconfwo.cfm
> 
> ~ Justice Dept. vs. States on Phone Privacy
> Can the feds stop states from investigating whether telcos 
> helped the NSA spy on Americans?
> http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/asection/la-na-tap21jun21,1,7897952.story?coll=la-news-a_section
> 
> ~ Google Transparency
> Google's new Public Policy Blog discusses... Google's 
> Public Policy!
> http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/
> 
> ~ Google Asks Government to Fight Censorship
> Are free speech restrictions also trade barriers?
> http://www.examiner.com/a-794215%7EGoogle_Asks_Gov_t_to_Fight_Censorship.html
> 
> ~ DRM-Free Sales Boom
> EMI reports that sales of some albums are up as much as 
> 350% now that MP3 tracks without DRM are available.
> http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=40443
> 
> ~ DRM Rises from the Dead
> The Blu-ray Disc Association is promoting the use of DRM on 
> DVDs.
> http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/06/20/bd-drm-is-now-available-for-blu-ray
> 
> ~ Googling for Downloads
> Music downloaders are circumventing P2P restrictions at 
> universities by using Google instead.
> http://www.slyck.com/news.php?story=1507
> 
> ~ iPhone Lowdown
> Preventng iPhone owners from installing software may hurt 
> their privacy.
> http://www.educatedguesswork.org/movabletype/archives/2007/06/a_very_sweet_so.html
> 
> ~ My Career as a TV Freeloader
> A Slate article describes how to tap into the neighbor's 
> on-demand television.
> http://www.slate.com/id/2167389
> 
> ~ Censorship and the DMCA
> How console manufacturers can shut down games they don't 
> like.
> http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042509.php
> 
> ~ An Obituary for Weedshare
> A radical way to buy and share music that never took off.
> http://www.openbusiness.cc/2007/06/11/weedshare-rip/
> 
> ~ Vonage and Spam
> Vonage is harvesting names from their refer-a-friend 
> program to send spam promotions.
> http://www.damniwish.com/2007/06/vonage-spams-cu.html
> 
> ~ CAN-SPAM With Nifty Web App
> Mailinator enables you to retrieve email without providing 
> any personal data.
> http://mailinator.com/
> 
> : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . :
> 
> * Administrivia
> 
> EFFector is published by:
> 
> The Electronic Frontier Foundation
> 454 Shotwell Street
> San Francisco CA 94110-1914 USA
> +1 415 436 9333 (voice)
> +1 415 436 9993 (fax)
>   http://www.eff.org/ 
> 
> Editor:
> Julie Lindner, Education Outreach Coordinator
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    
> 
> Membership & donation queries:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> General EFF, legal, policy, or online resources queries:
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Reproduction of this publication in electronic media is 
> encouraged. Signed articles do not necessarily represent 
> the views of EFF. To reproduce signed articles 
> individually, please contact the authors for their express 
> permission.
> Press releases and EFF announcements & articles may be 
> reproduced individually at will.
> 
> Current and back issues of EFFector are available via the 
> Web at:
>   http://www.eff.org/effector/
> 

> 
> This newsletter is printed on 100% recycled electrons.
> 


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to