Carl Lowenstein wrote:
> On 9/14/07, Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> kelsey hudson wrote:
>> > Is your cable through time warner or cox? If it's time warner, you're
>> > decidedly better-off!
>>
>> I have Cox's business cable package. $80 or so a month but I get a few
>> static IP's, no blocked ports, and a faster upstream. Would I still be
>> better off with Time Warner?
>>
>
> Isn't there a geographical barrier between Cox territory and
> Time-Warner territory. So you don't really have a choice unless you
> want to move to the other side.
Mostly this is true. However, I have friends that live in a part of Poway
where you can choose between the two.
--
Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
The more you read and observe about this Politics thing, you got to admit that
each party is worse than the other. The one that's out always looks the best.
- Will Rogers
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
