Gus Wirth wrote:
Ralph Shumaker wrote:
Michael O'Keefe wrote:
Thanks for that link. I didn't know such things were available now.
Here's my current config.log:
http://pastebin.com/m6293b02e
Well it seems pretty obvious now.
You don't have the required development libraries:
#ibgoffice-0.4 >= 0.5.3
#libgsf-1 >= 1.14.6
#libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.12
#libglade-2.0 >= 2.3.6
#gtk+-2.0 >= 2.10.0
#libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.0.0
#gconf-2.0
#libbonobo-2.0 >= 2.2.0
I distinctly remember yum installing most of these, if not all of them,
today!
But you probably didn't install the -devel packages. For each of the
packages listed above, you need the corresponding package with a name like:
libxml2-devel
gtk2-devel
libgnomeui-devel
etc.
Actually, yes, here's a list of all packages with 'devel' currently
installed on my system (which seems to include everything listed above):
# cat installed | grep devel
GConf2-devel.i386 2.18.0.1-2.fc7
installed
ORBit2-devel.i386 2.14.7-3.fc7
installed
alsa-lib-devel.i386 1.0.14-3.fc7
installed
atk-devel.i386 1.18.0-1.fc7
installed
audiofile-devel.i386 1:0.2.6-6.fc7
installed
cairo-devel.i386 1.4.10-1.fc7
installed
dbus-devel.i386 1.0.2-6.fc7
installed
dbus-glib-devel.i386 0.73-3.fc7
installed
esound-devel.i386 1:0.2.38-2.fc7
installed
fontconfig-devel.i386 2.4.2-3.fc7
installed
freetype-devel.i386 2.3.4-3.fc7
installed
glib-devel.i386 1:1.2.10-26.fc7
installed
glib2-devel.i386 2.12.13-1.fc7
installed
glibc-devel.i386 2.6-4
installed
gnome-keyring-devel.i386 0.8-1.fc7
installed
gnome-vfs2-devel.i386 2.18.1-4.fc7
installed
goffice-devel.i386 0.2.2-1.fc7
installed
goffice04-devel.i386 0.4.3-1.fc7
installed
gtk+-devel.i386 1:1.2.10-57.fc7
installed
gtk2-devel.i386 2.10.14-3.fc7
installed
hal-devel.i386 0.5.9-8.fc7
installed
libICE-devel.i386 1.0.3-2.1.fc7
installed
libIDL-devel.i386 0.8.8-1.fc7
installed
libSM-devel.i386 1.0.2-1
installed
libX11-devel.i386 1.0.3-8.fc7
installed
libXau-devel.i386 1.0.3-1.fc7
installed
libXcursor-devel.i386 1.1.8-1
installed
libXdmcp-devel.i386 1.0.2-2.fc7
installed
libXext-devel.i386 1.0.1-2.1
installed
libXfixes-devel.i386 4.0.3-1
installed
libXft-devel.i386 2.1.12-1.fc7
installed
libXi-devel.i386 1.1.1-1.fc7
installed
libXinerama-devel.i386 1.0.2-1.fc7
installed
libXrandr-devel.i386 1.2.0-3.fc7
installed
libXrender-devel.i386 0.9.2-1.fc7
installed
libXt-devel.i386 1.0.4-1.fc7
installed
libart_lgpl-devel.i386 2.3.19-2.fc7
installed
libbonobo-devel.i386 2.18.0-3.fc7
installed
libbonoboui-devel.i386 2.18.0-1.fc7
installed
libgcrypt-devel.i386 1.2.4-1
installed
libglade2-devel.i386 2.6.0-3.fc7
installed
libgnome-devel.i386 2.18.0-4.fc7
installed
libgnomecanvas-devel.i386 2.14.0-5.fc7
installed
libgnomeprint22-devel.i386 2.18.0-1.fc7
installed
libgnomeui-devel.i386 2.18.1-2.fc7
installed
libgpg-error-devel.i386 1.4-2
installed
libgsf-devel.i386 1.14.3-4.fc7
installed
libgsf-gnome-devel.i386 1.14.3-4.fc7
installed
libpng-devel.i386 2:1.2.22-1.fc7
installed
libstdc++-devel.i386 4.1.2-27.fc7
installed
libxml2-devel.i386 2.6.29-1.fc7
installed
libxslt-devel.i386 1.1.21-1.fc7
installed
mesa-libGL-devel.i386 6.5.2-13.fc7
installed
pango-devel.i386 1.16.4-2.fc7
installed
perl-devel.i386 4:5.8.8-27.fc7
installed
python-devel.i386 2.5-15.fc7
installed
xine-lib-devel.i386 1.1.7-1.fc7
installed
xorg-x11-proto-devel.i386 7.2-9.fc7
installed
zlib-devel.i386 1.2.3-10.fc7 installed
The interesting thing about most of the items in this list is that each
time I yum installed one of those, it would THEN appear in the list of
things that are missing.
Here is the output of 'yum list installed':
http://pastebin.com/m18d02cb4
I would like to compile a short list, but it seems that there are tricks
to matching up the names right, such as config.log says gtk+-2.0 where
yum says gtk2.
I know there are at least two items in the list whose versions are lower
than ./configure is seeking. Is that a dead end? I got the latest
versions that yum will give me.
Yup. Unless you are willing to build ALL those packages. Or wait for the
next release of Fedora which should have all the updates, which will
happen in about five months. You might check Rawhide (Fedora development
branch) to see if they already have the updates.
My biggest problem is trying to make heads or tails of what config.log
wants and the package names. I don't think many of them are under the
version sought, just 2 that I know of. I don't mind trying to build
those. I just need to figure out how to do all that. In fact,
config.log itself says:
configure:22348: error: Package requirements (
libgoffice-0.4 >= 0.5.3
libgsf-1 >= 1.14.6
libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.12
libglade-2.0 >= 2.3.6
gtk+-2.0 >= 2.10.0
libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.0.0
gconf-2.0
libbonobo-2.0 >= 2.2.0
) were not met:
Requested 'libgoffice-0.4 >= 0.5.3' but version of libGOffice is 0.4.3
Requested 'libgsf-1 >= 1.14.6' but version of libgsf-1 is 1.14.3
It lists several packages in 'Package requirements (...) were not met:'.
But it seems to be complaining only about libgoffice04 and libgsf. Now
really, how obvious is it that I need to look for goffice04 when it is
calling for libgoffice-0.4?
I would just like to find out *all* the things ./configure wants instead
of just one at a time. If I have to go grab only 2 packages and build
those, I'm eager to get started. But if 2 turns to 3 turns to 7 turns
to 20 ..., then I think that may give me pause.
--
Ralph
--------------------
The spelling of words is subordinate. Morbidness for nice spelling and tenacity
for or against one letter or so means dandyism and impotence in literature.
--Walt Whitman
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
