Ralph Shumaker wrote: > Michael O'Keefe wrote: >>> Thanks for that link. I didn't know such things were available now. >>> Here's my current config.log: >>> http://pastebin.com/m6293b02e >> >> Well it seems pretty obvious now. >> You don't have the required development libraries: >> >> #ibgoffice-0.4 >= 0.5.3 >> #libgsf-1 >= 1.14.6 >> #libxml-2.0 >= 2.4.12 >> #libglade-2.0 >= 2.3.6 >> #gtk+-2.0 >= 2.10.0 >> #libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.0.0 >> #gconf-2.0 >> #libbonobo-2.0 >= 2.2.0 >> > > I distinctly remember yum installing most of these, if not all of them, > today!
But you probably didn't install the -devel packages. For each of the packages listed above, you need the corresponding package with a name like: libxml2-devel gtk2-devel libgnomeui-devel etc. > The interesting thing about most of the items in this list is that each > time I yum installed one of those, it would THEN appear in the list of > things that are missing. > > Here is the output of 'yum list installed': > http://pastebin.com/m18d02cb4 > > I would like to compile a short list, but it seems that there are tricks > to matching up the names right, such as config.log says gtk+-2.0 where > yum says gtk2. > > I know there are at least two items in the list whose versions are lower > than ./configure is seeking. Is that a dead end? I got the latest > versions that yum will give me. Yup. Unless you are willing to build ALL those packages. Or wait for the next release of Fedora which should have all the updates, which will happen in about five months. You might check Rawhide (Fedora development branch) to see if they already have the updates. Or find some Linux distribution (Bleeding Edge Linux?) that has what you want. Gus -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
