On 12/15/07, Richard Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, Bob La Quey wrote:
> > On Dec 15, 2007 10:54 PM, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> The RAID cards that I am using now don't require any host OS driver. You
> >> configure it by hitting F3 during the boot process, and managing that
> >> way. However, there is no way to know if a particular disk is suffering
> >> degradation unless your host system has the proper driver.
> >>
> >> I forget the exact model number, but these are 3Ware SATA RAID cards.
> >>
> >> -john
> >
> > Back to the main issue.
> >
> > Why use hardware RAID at all if you decide to go with
> > ZFS? Why not JBOD? Cheaper and more reliable (No RAID
> > controller as a single point of failure for hardware
> > RAID.)
>
> Except isnt that the issue, IF its not a single point of failure, and IF its 
> not
> as much of a hack as mentioned then thats why you use RAID???
>
> JOBD is fine, but its not great, I dont have ZFS experience but I do have RAID
> and JOBD experience Ill take a good RAID card any day.
>
> Richard Reynolds
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yes but ...

It seems from what I read that ZFS accomplishes all of what
hardware RAID does but without the hardware. So where lies
the hardware RAID advantage?

I still do _not_ get it.

BobLQ


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to