Tracy R Reed wrote: > James G. Sack (jim) wrote: >> Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >>> Um, and there is no reason why you can't just create a cabinet in which >>> the "main" processor *is* the "disk" processor. >> >> That sounds like what Tracy is doing.. :-) > > Exactly! And it's working out great. In the near future I hope to have a > system I can demo for KPLUG at a meeting if people are interested. > Depends on the timing of the meeting and when I get the system and when > it has to go into production. Although really AoE can be demonstrated > between two laptops quite handily so that might have to suffice if > anyone wanted to see it in action. Although on second thought it really > isn't a very impressive. It's a block device. And you can write to it. > You have to trust me that it is hosted on that other machine and that I > am writing to it from this machine.
Ya'know what I think would make a hot demo -- pulling some plugs and demonstrating automatic (or at least idiot-proof^Wresistant) failover/recovery. hmmm, sorta sounds like a sales presentation. Regards, ..jim -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
