> > > Really? > > Yes. > > The answer is simply that git/mercurial/bzr/darcs store much more > metadata than CVS/SVN. > > Therefore, mercurial/darcs/bzr/darcs are, by definition, no worse. And, > yet, they have the possibility of being better. >
Sorry. You meant, better functionality wise, Worse storage, time and network bandwidth wise, right? -Thomas Gal -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
