On Jan 14, 2008 9:33 PM, James G. Sack (jim) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> maverick wrote:
> > Hi guys I would like to install Linux on 1GB of space this system
> already dual boots can someone recommend one that works well.  I'm use to
> rpm base linuxes but I'm willing to try something new.
> >
>
> I think this is the environment where puppy linux shines (wags?).
>  http://www.puppylinux.org/
>  http://puppylinux.org/wikka/PuppyLinuxMainPage
>
> There are probably others.
> Damn Small Linux comes to mind, but I think that one is so pared-down
> that it may be considered a repair/diagnostic tool rather than a
> distribution. Other opinions invited here.
>
> And someone correct me if I'm wrong, but Puppy is busybox based,
> resulting in some programs having different or missing command-line
> options. This may only be a concern for *nix veterans -- but still, it
> might be useful to be aware of it.
>
> Regards,
> ..jim
>
>
I've just finished working with both distros. My take is, Puppy is fine for
fairly new, but underpowered PCs. I tried to install it on an ancient
Toshiba Libretto L3 on a CF card. This laptap has 256MB RAM, S3 video. My
main problem was I couldn't get my older PCMCIA Orinoco wireless card
configured. I did manage to get wireless working with a Linksys USB, but
that would cause the system to freeze, requiring a hard reset to get going
again. It can install to CF card in a USB adapter, then I could put the CF
card into an CF-IDE adapter and the laptop would boot.

I've sinced move to Damn Small Linux because of the older kernel -
2.4.xinstead of
2.6.x. Not only does my Orinoco card work right from the start, the system
no longer freezes up and it's much faster. Sure, I have to run WEP instead
of WPA2, but I don't really care. In order to install DSL on the CF card, I
had to get another CF-IDE adapter that would support 40 pins. I installed
DSL as I would to a regular hard drive.

Now, this little laptop has a CF card in place of the regular HD. I'm
getting run times around 7 hours w/o WIFI. I'll see how it goes with WIFI,
but it's been running for over 3 and still going strong.

So, in a nutshell, if you need to run slightly more vintage equipment, DSL
might run better than Puppy. Puppy is easier to install if you don't have a
bootable CDROM or floppy - like I do with the Libretto...

HTH

-- 
Mark Schoonover, CMDBA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/markschoonover
http://marksitblog.blogspot.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to