Tracy R Reed([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:00:53PM -0800:
> Todd Walton wrote:
> >I, personally, would use Xen just so I could learn it better.  But if
> >you're not doing Windows at all, UML is supposed to be pretty fast.
> 
> Actually UML is among the slowest of the virtualization methods. I would 
> second Xen if you are just doing Linux. Otherwise vmware might be the 
> way to go although I always prefer the free software. Yes, 
> Fedora/Redhat's integration of xen does make it pretty easy to use these 
> days.

One that I'm planning to look into shortly is KVM.  This is a
hypervisor that's built into the Linux kernel.   The Feb. 2008
issue of Linux Journal has an article about it.  

 ... Hmmm...
In reviewing that article, I see that KVM requires the CPU to
support virtualization.   IIRC, the original poster's description
said his CPU doesn't have that.  In which case, Xen would be my
second choice.

Wade Curry
syntaxman


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to