On Sun, March 2, 2008 5:10 am, Todd Walton wrote: > On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Lan Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks again, and pray forgive the "Ryss" (not a bad name, but not >> yours). > > Somebody called you "Les" earlier anyway. It must be going around. > >> I usually proof read a bit better. > > Should I correct "proof read", or is that a trip wire? > > -todd >
One of the real failings of spell checkers is the inability to pick up compound words spelled separately, like "cannot" being munged into "can not" (almost[0] always wrong). Not that squirrel mail has a working spell checker. The principle of "good enough" has me locked into a mail reader that I don't like, but am too lazy to migrate away from. Besides, as Neil points out, the flexibility of being able to fall back on a web interface is noce. Can you say fetchmail -> imap? Sure you can ... but can Lan (or Les) make the transition? [0] Actually, according to my 5th form English teacher, Mr. Armstrong (who knew a hell of a lot more than I ever have), _always_ wrong. -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
