Doug LaRue wrote:
it just does not work for an n Party system where n>2 and though I am an
undeclared voter, I must vote for the candidate who'll do the least harm
based on what harm could conceivably be done.
Which is exactly why we have a system dominated by two crappy parties.
The general voting public thinks they must vote for the least damaging
of those two parties, instead of dropping both and voting for a
candidate from one of the others.
I did not vote for Bush. I did not vote for Clinton. I won't vote for
Dem. or Rep. in this election either. I won't support the two seriously
broken parties and their broken candidates.
If Ron Paul was in the running (As Andrew said on Kooler about other
candidates, he's not and never was because the crappy press would not
give him press time, despite him winning every debate. I also think the
Rep. party was afraid of him.), he would have my vote. He was running as
Rep., but he is really a Libertarian. He realizes that our system is
broken and had less of a chance in another party. So, he ran as a Rep.
PGA
--
Paul G. Allen, BSIT/SE
Owner, Sr. Engineer
Random Logic Consulting Services
www.randomlogic.com
--
KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
