On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Andrew Lentvorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bob La Quey wrote: > > > > PS. What do you propose as "stuff to do good?" > > [snip] > > None of these things would ever come out of the back-fence gossip chamber I > call the "web 2.0 circlejerk".
Suddenly "I get it." A is reacting to the fact that 99% or the stuff on Web 2.0 is trash. I agree with this analysis. 99% of everything is trash. I am saying that this technology is also enabling a 1% (or 0.1%) of new stuff that is really great. That is what interests me. Same as it always was. Gutenberg enabled huge amounts of trash, but Gutenberg also enabled the modern world. Web 2.0 obviouwsly does not enable everything so when I get back to the [snip] I will discuss that on its own merits. The fact that there are intersting things that Web 2.0 does _not_ enable is a red herring. So it goes, BobLQ "Amazing the insight a good piss gives" -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
