On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Gregory K. Ruiz-Ade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In today's computing environment, This just seems outrageously stupid to > me. It's not like being root is some magical, bureaucratically-approved > status. Any idiot can have root on a machine thanks to Linux, *BSD, Mac OS > X, etc. There's just nothing special about low ports anymore, if you ask > me, so it seems kind of silly to still require that a process be owned by > root in order to snag a listening port < 1024. This should be fixable with > relative ease (Linux, *BSD), but I've never looked into it. > Something like this http://killa.net/infosec/acls/ -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
