Am Samstag, 26. Juli 2008 05:19:50 schrieb Tracy R Reed: > James G. Sack (jim) wrote: > > In the old days, boot had to be below the 1024-cylinder limit (or > > something like that), but what is the advantage of a small boot > > partition on current hardware and with today's bootloaders? Is there > > really anything operational, or perhaps it might be just a convenience > > -- say, for maintenance purposes? > > grub doesn't speak LVM so if you put /boot inside LVM you will have > problems.
From "Things I figured the hard way" by Dexter Filmore. Luckily only a testing VM. Hope grub2 will go final soon, especially for config chaining so I won't have to update menu.lst manually on boxes with more than one distro. Dex -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C++++ UL++ P+>++ L+++>++++ E-- W++ N o? K- w--(---) !O M+ V- PS+ PE Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(++) tv--(+)@ b++(+++) DI+++ D- G++ e* h>++ r* y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de -- KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
