begin  quoting boblq as of Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:53:34AM -0700:
> On Tuesday 22 August 2006 05:45 pm, Stewart Stremler wrote:
> >
> > Me, I want minimum aggravation/day. But I have a hard time selling that.
> 
> I had a friend who was a very good programmer. He always said, 
> "My best lines of code are those I don't write. They have no bugs
> and run rally fast."  He spent a lot of time just thinking about his code 
> and wrote really tight and very clear code.

I like.

If you provide a name, I'll sigify his assertion and attribute it
properly. :)

>                                             Course this was mostly 
> Forth, but the principle is not language specific. 

Heh.
 
> In the past much of my consulting generated negative lines of code
> each day as we abstracted and modularized code that had been 
> poorly designed in the beginning. 

Did you gain an insight as to why the poor design?  I'm looking at
some rather tight deadlines, and I can feel my design decisions
shifting from "do it right" to "who cares so long as it runs"...

*sigh*

If you succeed in delivering under an impossible deadline, they'll
merely ask you to do it again, and again, and again.

-- 
_ |\_
 \|

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to