On Sat, December 9, 2006 12:28 pm, Stewart Stremler wrote: > begin quoting Lan Barnes as of Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 09:04:39AM -0800: >> > [snip] >> Doesn't this XP sound an awful lot like enshrining SEI CMM level 1 as >> the >> highest level to aspire to? >> >> It's just too programmer-centric and too dependent on heroism. > > Yes, it programmer-centric, but it doesn't depend on heroism -- > after all, heros don't like pair programming, much less writing the > unit tests first. > > I ran across an interesting article w/r/t XP and CMMI levels. The > claim is that XP is a vertical slice through levels 2 through 5: >
... and the operant word is "claim." Note claiming source. I think the SEI would say that the CMM isn't a pu pu platter where you pick what you like. -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
