Nikolaj Baer wrote: > OO, on the other hand, is quite a specific and well defined approach, > as Tracy noted, and it seems unfair to lump that in the same pot > "Agile".
Oh, I don't know. OO has been pretty well abused too. I think my favourite was this wonderful word association: "book on OO assembler (which is rational)... you can do OO programming in assembler! (also rational)... there are OO programming languages... (again, rationa).... assembler is an OO programming language! (WHA?)... --Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
