LOL. I am with Chris here. I also find his definition both useful and adequate.
The essence about OOP is recognizing the advantages (hard core FP types might argue it is "failing to recognize the disadvantages" ;-) of binding data structures and the operations on those data structures together in to objects (and no, that doesn't necessarily mean objects have their own state) and then organizing your program around objects and their relationships between one another.
BobLQ On 12/19/06, Christopher Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > I could find only eight: 9) Hype. ;-) --Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
