Stewart Stremler wrote:
begin quoting Ralph Shumaker as of Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 09:56:40PM -0700:
Ralph Shumaker wrote:
[chop]
Actually, I think it said that the two were identical.
It may have been the problem identified by the link provided by DtL, in
which case, I never had all the information.
?
Was that the drive-by top-poster that I ignored?
That was the one. This is the link he gave:
http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=1613&sid=605f450444088916b3016533b98eb868
Apparently, the two pyramids in question are *not* the same, except that
they are both completely equilateral. One has a square base. The other
has a triangle base. The answer seems like it would be 7 since the one
has 5 sides, the other has 4 sides, and one side of each is completely
covered up. But 7 is *not* the correct answer. Can you guess what it
is? (BTW, the official SAT answer apparrently *was* "7", but was
challenged, and found to be wrong.)
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
