begin  quoting Darren New as of Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 12:31:37PM -0700:
> Stewart Stremler wrote:
> >I suspect any flavor of UNIX is better than any version of MSDOS.
> 
> Depends on what you're doing, really. Software to drive custom devices 
> (like, say, configuring phone switches) is much easier when you don't 
> have to worry about interfacing with a kernel and all. If all you really 
> want is a single-user file system and a program loader, DOS (and CP/M) 
> works pretty well. :-)

In that case, I'd just go with a program loader that didn't have
delusions of being an OS. (Or that would load an OS as one of the
programs to load, to aid in configuration/debugging.)

I'll concede that a linux-style OS for embedded systems may not be
ideal.

> Or, as one coworked once commented, "It doesn't have to be a fast 
> machine. One step up from a power supply would do."

Heh.

> ObUsefulContent:
> 
> http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/04/05/143233

Hm. An ARM system?  I think I need one....

-- 
No ARM machines yet.
Stewart Stremler

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to