James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
especially interesting is a flash presentation
http://subtextual.org/demo1.html
I saw this same flash presentation with the same examples years ago.
It's not really obvious it's any easier than the normal definition of
factorial or whatever. How would you handle database, 3D graphics, etc?
There's another language called "boxer" which also loses the source (so
to speak) and would seem to be better at functional programming, or at
least teaching that. You might be able to dig something up on that, if
you like these kinds of languages.
I believe he's onto something big!
If he is, he's doing a poor job of actually producing something with it.
:-) It doesn't seem to be that far different from QBE.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
I bet exercise equipment would be a lot more
expensive if we had evolved from starfish.
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
