Christopher Smith wrote:
Binding != typing.
Yes. Ada has way less dynamic binding as well. It's neither especially
dynamically typed nor especially dynamically bound. Virtually everything
is statically bound, unless you go out of your way to essentially say
"this type and its subtypes has a pointer to the code that implements
it." It's *way* less dynamic than something like Java.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Remember the good old days, when we
used to complain about cryptography
being export-restricted?
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
