Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > David Brown wrote: >> >> Apple seems to be subtly pushing LLVM >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LLVM>. >> I'm not sure how much of an improvement it is. > > I see LLVM as a nice way to patch up the fact that we have been stuck > with crappy linkers for far too long. LLVM places function call *and* > function prototype information back together. > > If it does nothing except that, I will consider it a win. Anything > else would be gravy. Weren't we trying to do that ages ago with ANDF?
--Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
