begin quoting Brad Beyenhof as of Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 07:21:26AM -0800: > On Jan 8, 2008 2:02 AM, SJS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There's lots of stuff to criticize. Have fun. > > From a functional standpoint, it runs and does what you built it to > do... whether or not it's "the most efficient way," I'm impressed. > > The only problems I encountered (as a newbish C guy) were a few
Nothing in the code struck you as a problem? > compiling errors: > sliding_nine.c: In function 'new': > sliding_nine.c:208: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of > built-in function 'strncpy' > sliding_nine.c: In function 'main': > sliding_nine.c:418: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of > built-in function 'strlen' > sliding_nine.c:421: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of > built-in function 'strncpy' Try changing #include <strings.h> to #include <string.h>. I've seen both, but I don't remember which one is more standard. > Those didn't keep the program from running as long as I supplied > proper arguments, though. > > This is with gcc version 4.1.3 20070929 on Ubuntu Server 7.10. I should check the GCC version I used to compile and run it. Good idea. -- They say that C is the portable assembler of tool code For values of 'portable' that mean 'a moderate workload' Stewart Stremler -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
