Neil Schneider wrote: > Why is it a bad decision? It was done to keep bandwidth at a miminum. Someone > sending a 1Mb image attachment to the list consumes 1Mb*n bandwidth, where n > is the number of subscribers. Our bandwidth is donated and it is courtesy to > reduce the amount of bandwidth through policies that we can enforce. Source > code is plain text and as such fits fine inside of the body of email. > I know for sure that Mailman has a "maximum message size" setting (as does postfix/sendmail/qmail, for that matter). If managing bandwidth is the concern.... isn't it more logical to manage it through that, rather than through some kind of proxy, like attachments?
--Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
