Brad Beyenhof wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 12:56 PM, John H. Robinson, IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Neil Schneider wrote:
>> > "Nothing wrong with text/plain attachments" except that AFAIK the options
>> are
>> > allow attachment or don't allow attachments. There is no option to allow
>> plain
>> > text attachments, don't allow jpeg attachments.
>>
>> I no longer do the admin of the lists, so I don't know. I would think
>> that MailMan could be configured to whitelist certain attachments, and
>> strip others. If not, I am positive Postfix can.
>
> I know for a fact (from adminning a mailman list) that specific MIME
> types can be explicitly allowed if you have otherwise disallowed
> attachments.
>
> Not that I think they *should* be, as many people have pointed out the
> myriad of other options for sharing code. If you don't have a
> ~/public_html somewhere, it shouldn't be too hard to find one (either
> on your own box or somebody else's).
>
I checked the configuration for this list. The following mime types are
allowed. I didn't change this configuration is was already set. So if you
can't send code as an attachment then you are not mime encoding it right. I
think it should be coded as text/plain.
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
multipart/signed
text/plain
application/pgp-signature
message/rfc822
--
Neil Schneider pacneil_at_linuxgeek_dot_net
http://www.paccomp.com
Key fingerprint = 67F0 E493 FCC0 0A8C 769B 8209 32D7 1DB1 8460 C47D
I help busy professionals diversify their self-directed IRAs and portfolios
with real estate they don't have to manage. Please let me know if you or
someone you know would like more information.
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
