> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Maybe this is just a naive thought but I'd like to have the most > terse/elegant/readable language and then have the most powerfully built Ok, I've seen this pop up several times in this discussion and can't bite my tongue anymore. Terse != readable. I find that programs that try to be as terse as possible, even when they still use good variable names, frequently are unmaintainable. I find myself adding code to make it readable far more frequently than taking it away. Gabe _________________________________________________________________ Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your HotmailĀ®-get your "fix". http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in Lisp - ... Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in Lis... David Brown
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in... SJS
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggag... Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggag... David Brown
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggag... Christopher Smith
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in Lis... James G. Sack (jim)
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in Lis... chris
- RE: Disappointed in historical baggage in... Gabriel Sechan
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggag... Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggag... SJS
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in... Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in... Christopher Smith
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in Lis... Christopher Smith
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in... Chuck Esterbrook
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggag... Christopher Smith
- Strings (Was: Disappointed in historical baggage in Li... SJS
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in Lisp - Lisp ... Andrew Lentvorski
- Re: Disappointed in historical baggage in Lisp - ... Christopher Smith
