On Jan 25, 2008 1:39 PM, Gabriel Sechan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Maybe this is just a naive thought but I'd like to have the most
> > terse/elegant/readable language and then have the most powerfully built
>
>
> Ok, I've seen this pop up several times in this discussion and can't bite my 
> tongue anymore.  Terse != readable.  I find that programs that try to be as 
> terse as possible, even when they still use good variable names, frequently 
> are unmaintainable.  I find myself adding code to make it readable far more 
> frequently than taking it away.

Overall I agree. FORTH is a great example of where terse can become a
form of "source code encryption" even when that's not the intent.

But I certainly prefer succinct code.

I guess you could say there is a balance to this as with most things.

-Chuck

-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg

Reply via email to