On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Andrew Lentvorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > > No, let's make it really tiny (LISP). > > Ahem. Exactly what language are *you* looking at? > > Common Lisp is very large. Scheme is small--until you try to do > anything with it at which point you immediately import a ton of > libraries to do anything useful. > > -a
I was thinking of the original McCarthy LISP/eval which I understand to be small. Which theoretically is nice, but for software development I like having a larger feature set as my toolbox. -Chuck -- http://cobra-language.com/ -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
