Christopher Smith wrote:
You may now commence griping about how C++ sucks, is overly complex, and
these changes only make it worse.
Are these really closures? I don't see in any of the examples unbound
variables. Not that you couldn't do it with proper compiler support,
but the examples shown certainly aren't showing off (say) storing a
closure in a global, returning from the function that created it, then
accessing the local variables from the function that created the closure.
Note that later versions of C# handle this by basically making an
anonymous class and copying the local variables into it, letting you
nest closures and functions while returning them from the creating
function. So maybe C++ does this. But it certainly isn't obvious from
this article.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
"That's pretty. Where's that?"
"It's the Age of Channelwood."
"We should go there on vacation some time."
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
