On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 02:56:39PM -0700, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > Because Mono now has a "Microsoft patent license" implication thanks to > Novell. The actual *creation* of Mono is now suspect since it isn't > considered to be a "clean room" implementation, anymore.
Ug yea I forgot about that deal. So you're saying Mono may have been ok before the M$-Novell deal but any code written *after* that is always suspect? I think I'll stick to JVMs then TYVM. cs -- KPLUG-LPSG@kernel-panic.org http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
